Why The Inverted Yield Curve Is Now Broken As A Recession Indicator
This article is so good
it's for premium members only.
Does that sound like you?
PREMIUM
ONLY $30/MONTH
BILLED ANNUALLY OR $35 MONTHLY
All BASIC features, plus:
- Premium Articles: Dive into subscriber-only content, market analysis, and insights that keep you ahead of the game.
- Access to our Private X Account, The Market Ear analysis, and Newsquawk
- Ad-Free Experience: Enjoy an uninterrupted browsing experience.
PROFESSIONAL
ONLY $125/MONTH
BILLED ANNUALLY OR $150 MONTHLY
All PREMIUM features, plus:
- Research Catalog: Access to our constantly updated research database, via a private Dropbox account (including hedge fund letters, research reports and analyses from all the top Wall Street banks)
By Simon White, Bloomberg markets live reporter and strategist
An inverted yield curve is no longer a reliable sign of a recession in the new monetary system of ample reserves and where the core money-market instrument is repo. The shifts in the plumbing of money markets over the last decade are as radical to finance as the invention of the iPhone was to telephony. The emergency response to the GFC and the need to move away from LIBOR - a manipulable, unsecured funding rate - as the core benchmark for money markets has led to a greatly altered financial backdrop.
One of the most significant implications is the effect on the yield curve. It has never before been inverted for this length of time, giving rise to incessant recession speculation. However, not only has a yield-curve inversion never been a necessary nor a sufficient condition for a downturn, the overhaul in the financial plumbing of the market means it is effectively now broken as a recession indicator.