PremiumWall Street Going "All-In On Trump"
This article is so good
it's for premium members only.
Does that sound like you?
Already a member? Sign in.
PREMIUM
ONLY $30/MONTH
BILLED ANNUALLY OR $35 MONTHLY
All BASIC features, plus:
- Premium Articles: Dive into subscriber-only content, market analysis, and insights that keep you ahead of the game.
- Access to our Private X Account, The Market Ear analysis, and Newsquawk
- Ad-Free Experience: Enjoy an uninterrupted browsing experience.
PROFESSIONAL
ONLY $125/MONTH
BILLED ANNUALLY OR $150 MONTHLY
All PREMIUM features, plus:
- Research Catalog: Access to our constantly updated research database, via a private Dropbox account (including hedge fund letters, research reports and analyses from all the top Wall Street banks)
Matt Drudge's slide into mainstream media obscurity has been one of the more remarkable events of the post-Trump era, yet - like an insane uncle locked up in the attic - few would bring it up in polite conversation (especially since so little is known about what caused Drudge's striking U-turn in his one-time embrace of Trump). However, his tweet (or post) from last week that according to Wall Street, Kamala had a 72 chance to win (since deleted)...
... prompted us to respond.