Premium"The Big Dynamics Of The Game Have Changed"; Goldman Hedge Fund Honcho Fears April 2nd May Not Be A 'Clearing Event'
This article is so good
it's for premium members only.
Does that sound like you?
Already a member? Sign in.
PREMIUM
ONLY $30/MONTH
BILLED ANNUALLY OR $35 MONTHLY
All BASIC features, plus:
- Premium Articles: Dive into subscriber-only content, market analysis, and insights that keep you ahead of the game.
- Access to our Private X Account, The Market Ear analysis, and Newsquawk
- Ad-Free Experience: Enjoy an uninterrupted browsing experience.
PROFESSIONAL
ONLY $125/MONTH
BILLED ANNUALLY OR $150 MONTHLY
All PREMIUM features, plus:
- Research Catalog: Access to our constantly updated research database, via a private Dropbox account (including hedge fund letters, research reports and analyses from all the top Wall Street banks)
Last week brought another mixed bag of data, but it skewed net negative, and Goldman Sachs cut their Q1 GDP estimate to just 0.6% (the miss in personal spending took a notably large bite).
As Goldman Sachs head of hedge fund coverage, Tony Pasquariello notes, this was not lost on money managers: as you can see below, the market’s implied growth view has (more or less) converged down to where we think the economy is headed.
This benchmarks our cyclicals-vs-defensives pair (dark blue line) vs our expectations and market consensus for US GDP growth. to my eye, after a meaningful overshoot in the market, there’s no meaningful disjunction now